PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHE vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBHE vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBHE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*

IWM

1D
0.46%
1M
4.31%
YTD
21.03%
6M
17.89%
1Y
39.77%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
11.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHE vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBHE
iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF
0.00%4.45%7.62%10.32%-4.08%4.40%4.16%5.49%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
21.03%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHE and IWM is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between IBHE and IWM has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBHE vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHE vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBHEIWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.32

1.33

+0.98

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

25.02

3.62

+21.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

98.47

12.82

+85.65

IBHE vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHE Sharpe Ratio is 3.89, which is higher than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHE and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBHE vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHE drawdown since its inception was -26.91%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHE and IWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHEIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.91%

-59.05%

+32.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.11%

-11.03%

+10.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.94%

-27.50%

+26.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.51%

-31.91%

+23.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.50%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-10.74%

+9.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

3.11%

-3.06%

Volatility

IBHE vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) is 0.00%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that IBHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBHEIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

6.52%

-6.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.38%

14.30%

-13.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74%

19.71%

-18.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.87%

22.60%

-17.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.52%

23.06%

-11.54%

IBHE vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBHE vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

IBHE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBHE
iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF
2.29%4.53%6.92%7.17%5.77%4.84%5.74%3.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.90%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBHE and IWM have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to IBHE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHE dropped -26.91% vs IWM's -59.05%.

On 5-year performance, IWM leads with 6.33% vs 3.89% for IBHE. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IBHE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IWM has performed better with a 6.33% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHE.

IBHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.90% for IWM.

IBHE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IBHE tracks Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHE and 0.19% for IWM.

IBHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBHE and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer