IBHE vs. FHYS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBHE (iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF) and FHYS (Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. IBHE is passively managed, while FHYS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBHE returned 6.07%/yr vs 7.83%/yr for FHYS. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBHE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for FHYS.

Performance

IBHE vs. FHYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) and Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IBHE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 2.31%
• 3Y*: 6.07%
• 5Y*: 3.89%
• 10Y*: —

FHYS

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 1.89%
• 1Y: 6.49%
• 3Y*: 7.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHE vs. FHYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF	0.00%	4.45%	7.62%	10.32%	-4.08%	0.56%
FHYS Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF	1.48%	7.72%	7.23%	10.88%	-7.31%	0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHE and FHYS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2021	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between IBHE and FHYS has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IBHE vs. FHYS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IBHE	FHYS
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	91.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	8.3%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IBHE vs. FHYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHE

IBHE Risk / Return Rank: 97
IBHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
IBHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
IBHE Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBHE Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FHYS

FHYS Risk / Return Rank: 82
FHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHE vs. FHYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) and Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBHE	FHYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.51	2.44	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.33	3.82	+2.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.19	1.52	+0.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.78	3.92	+8.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	63.40	20.21	+43.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBHE vs. FHYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHE Sharpe Ratio is 3.51, which is higher than the FHYS Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHE and FHYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBHE	FHYS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.51	2.44	+1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.91	-0.51

Drawdowns

IBHE vs. FHYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHE drawdown since its inception was -26.91%, which is greater than FHYS's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHE and FHYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBHE	FHYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.91%	-11.62%	-15.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.22%	-1.66%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.94%	-3.16%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.16%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.42%	-2.29%	+0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.05%	0.32%	-0.27%

Volatility

IBHE vs. FHYS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) is 0.00%, while Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) has a volatility of 0.76%. This indicates that IBHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBHE	FHYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	0.76%	-0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.39%	2.18%	-1.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78%	2.67%	-1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.87%	4.95%	-0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.53%	4.95%	+6.58%

IBHE vs. FHYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FHYS's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBHE vs. FHYS - Dividend Comparison

IBHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than FHYS's 5.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FHYS Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF	5.77%	5.96%	6.42%	6.76%	6.25%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF	2.29%	4.53%	6.92%	7.17%	5.77%	4.84%	5.74%	3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBHE and FHYS in my portfolio?

IBHE and FHYS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBHE or FHYS?

FHYS has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to IBHE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHE dropped -26.91% vs FHYS's -11.62%.

Which ETF is better, IBHE or FHYS?

On 3-year performance, FHYS leads with 7.83% vs 6.07% for IBHE. On fees, IBHE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBHE or FHYS?

Over the 3-year period, FHYS has performed better with a 7.83% return vs 6.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBHE or FHYS?

IBHE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for FHYS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBHE or FHYS?

FHYS has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 2.29% for IBHE.

What is the main difference between IBHE and FHYS?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHE and 0.51% for FHYS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.