IBHE vs. BSJR
IBHE (iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF) and BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IBHE tracks the Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index while BSJR tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBHE returned 3.89%/yr vs 3.37%/yr for BSJR. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBHE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJR.
Performance
IBHE vs. BSJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBHE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 2.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJR
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
IBHE vs. BSJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 0.00% | 4.45% | 7.62% | 10.32% | -4.08% | 4.40% | 4.16% | 2.39% |
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.11% | 7.41% | 7.15% | 11.91% | -11.35% | 3.60% | 5.69% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBHE and BSJR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IBHE and BSJR has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IBHE vs. BSJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBHE
BSJR
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
IBHE
BSJR
Basic Materials
IBHE
-
BSJR
Communication Services
IBHE
-
BSJR
Consumer Cyclical
IBHE
-
BSJR
Consumer Defensive
IBHE
-
BSJR
Energy
IBHE
-
BSJR
Financial Services
IBHE
-
BSJR
Healthcare
IBHE
-
BSJR
Industrials
IBHE
-
BSJR
Technology
IBHE
-
BSJR
Utilities
IBHE
-
BSJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHE vs. BSJR — Risk / Return Rank
IBHE
BSJR
IBHE vs. BSJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBHE | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.19 | 1.45 | +0.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.78 | 4.13 | +8.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 63.40 | 19.02 | +44.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBHE | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51 | 2.27 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.50 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.43 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
IBHE vs. BSJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHE drawdown since its inception was -26.91%, which is greater than BSJR's maximum drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHE and BSJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHE | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.91% | -22.58% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.22% | -1.16% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.94% | -3.15% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.51% | -16.37% | +7.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.27% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -3.25% | +1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.25% | -0.20% |
Volatility
IBHE vs. BSJR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) is 0.00%, while Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) has a volatility of 0.57%. This indicates that IBHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHE | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 0.57% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.39% | 1.45% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78% | 2.12% | -1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.87% | 6.73% | -1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.53% | 9.37% | +2.16% |
IBHE vs. BSJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJR's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHE vs. BSJR - Dividend Comparison
IBHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than BSJR's 5.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.75% | 6.19% | 6.75% | 6.48% | 5.37% | 4.49% | 4.53% | 1.20% |
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 2.29% | 4.53% | 6.92% | 7.17% | 5.77% | 4.84% | 5.74% | 3.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBHE and BSJR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSJR has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to IBHE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHE dropped -26.91% vs BSJR's -22.58%.
On 5-year performance, IBHE leads with 3.89% vs 3.37% for BSJR. On fees, IBHE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBHE has performed better with a 3.89% return vs 3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBHE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJR.
BSJR has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 2.29% for IBHE.
IBHE tracks Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index, while BSJR tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHE and 0.42% for BSJR.
IBHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBHE and BSJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer