IBHE vs. AMDG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

IBHE (iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHE is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index, while AMDG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. IBHE is passively managed, while AMDG is actively managed. Over the past year, IBHE returned 2.00% vs 966.90% for AMDG. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBHE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMDG.

Performance

IBHE vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IBHE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 2.00%
• 3Y*: 5.93%
• 5Y*: 3.89%
• 10Y*: —

AMDG

• 1D: 4.82%
• 1M: 30.80%
• YTD: 384.47%
• 6M: 379.60%
• 1Y: 966.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBHE vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF	0.00%	4.22%
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	384.47%	95.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IBHE and AMDG is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025	0.10

The correlation between IBHE and AMDG shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IBHE vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDG

AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHE vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBHE	AMDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.89	7.29	-3.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.42	4.26	+3.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.32	1.57	+0.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	25.02	17.30	+7.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	98.47	33.56	+64.91

IBHE vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHE Sharpe Ratio is 3.89, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 7.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHE and AMDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBHE vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHE drawdown since its inception was -26.91%, smaller than the maximum AMDG drawdown of -63.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHE and AMDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBHE	AMDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.91%	-63.32%	+36.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.11%	-56.48%	+56.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.34%	+1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.42%	-25.43%	+24.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.05%	29.05%	-29.00%

Volatility

IBHE vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) is 0.00%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 46.43%. This indicates that IBHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBHE	AMDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	46.43%	-46.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.38%	101.85%	-101.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74%	134.21%	-133.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.87%	132.22%	-127.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.52%	132.22%	-120.70%

IBHE vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBHE vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

IBHE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF	2.31%	11.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF	2.29%	4.53%	6.92%	7.17%	5.77%	4.84%	5.74%	3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBHE and AMDG in my portfolio?

IBHE and AMDG have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBHE or AMDG?

AMDG has higher volatility (46.43%) compared to IBHE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBHE dropped -26.91% vs AMDG's -63.32%.

Which ETF is better, IBHE or AMDG?

On 1-year performance, AMDG leads with 966.90% vs 2.00% for IBHE. On fees, IBHE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBHE or AMDG?

Over the 1-year period, AMDG has performed better with a 966.90% return vs 2.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBHE or AMDG?

IBHE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBHE or AMDG?

AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 2.29% for IBHE.

What is the main difference between IBHE and AMDG?

IBHE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while AMDG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHE and 0.75% for AMDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.29 vs 3.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.