IBHD vs. IWM
IBHD (iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBHD is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 2024 Term High Yield and Income Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. IBHD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
IBHD vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 18.84%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 41.60%
- 3Y*
- 19.00%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
IBHD vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBHD iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 10.38% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBHD vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
IBHD
IWM
IBHD vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHD) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBHD | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.37 | — |
Drawdowns
IBHD vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBHD drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHD and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBHD | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -59.05% | +59.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.01% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -10.77% | +10.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility
IBHD vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBHD | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 19.19% | -19.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 22.53% | -22.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 23.04% | -23.04% |
IBHD vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBHD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBHD vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
IBHD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHD iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.87% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHD.
IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.00% for IBHD.
IBHD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IBHD tracks Bloomberg 2024 Term High Yield and Income Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IBHD and 0.19% for IWM.
Find the right allocation for IBHD and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer