PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGX.L vs. JG15.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGX.L vs. JG15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares € Govt Bond 3-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGX.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist) (JG15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGX.L achieves a -2.99% return, which is significantly lower than JG15.L's 0.48% return.


IBGX.L

1D
0.16%
1M
-2.35%
6M
-2.43%
YTD
-2.99%
1Y
-1.44%
3Y*
2.30%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
0.25%

JG15.L

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.29%
6M
0.21%
YTD
0.48%
1Y
2.68%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGX.L vs. JG15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBGX.L
iShares € Govt Bond 3-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-2.99%7.79%-2.42%3.20%-5.19%-7.77%6.63%-3.37%3.14%
JG15.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist)
0.48%5.58%1.79%3.85%-5.75%-1.91%1.86%1.33%0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IBGX.L and JG15.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGX.L vs. JG15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGX.L
IBGX.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IBGX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

JG15.L
JG15.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JG15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JG15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JG15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
JG15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
JG15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGX.L vs. JG15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 3-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGX.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist) (JG15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBGX.LJG15.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.22

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

1.14

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

3.44

-4.17

IBGX.L vs. JG15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGX.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the JG15.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGX.L and JG15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBGX.L vs. JG15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, which is greater than JG15.L's maximum drawdown of -11.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGX.L and JG15.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGX.LJG15.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.93%

-11.34%

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-2.35%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.77%

-2.35%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.06%

-10.68%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.56%

-0.69%

-9.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-2.37%

-6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

0.78%

+1.20%

Volatility

IBGX.L vs. JG15.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares € Govt Bond 3-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGX.L) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist) (JG15.L) at 0.72%. This indicates that IBGX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JG15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGX.LJG15.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

0.72%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.48%

2.17%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.49%

2.39%

+2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.83%

3.07%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.94%

2.54%

+4.40%

IBGX.L vs. JG15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than JG15.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBGX.L vs. JG15.L - Dividend Comparison

IBGX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than JG15.L's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBGX.L
iShares € Govt Bond 3-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
2.51%2.47%2.65%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.08%0.12%0.60%
JG15.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist)
3.82%3.71%3.44%2.28%0.68%0.12%0.34%0.91%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBGX.L and JG15.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JG15.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JG15.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IBGX.L.

IBGX.L tracks BBG EU Term 3-5 Year Index, while JG15.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IBGX.L and 0.07% for JG15.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGX.L and JG15.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer