JG15.L vs. GLTS.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist) (JG15.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L).

JG15.L and GLTS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JG15.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018. GLTS.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. It was launched on May 17, 2012. Both JG15.L and GLTS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

JG15.L vs. GLTS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist) (JG15.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JG15.L vs. GLTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JG15.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist)	-0.41%	5.58%	1.79%	3.85%	-5.75%	-1.91%	1.86%	1.33%	0.58%
GLTS.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF	-0.22%	5.40%	1.76%	3.70%	-5.72%	-1.91%	1.77%	1.11%	0.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JG15.L achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than GLTS.L's -0.22% return.

JG15.L

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: -0.41%
• 6M: 1.15%
• 1Y: 3.41%
• 3Y*: 3.26%
• 5Y*: 0.70%
• 10Y*: —

GLTS.L

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -1.15%
• YTD: -0.22%
• 6M: 1.13%
• 1Y: 3.55%
• 3Y*: 3.27%
• 5Y*: 0.70%
• 10Y*: 0.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JG15.L vs. GLTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JG15.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GLTS.L

SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF

JG15.L

JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist)

Return for Risk

JG15.L vs. GLTS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JG15.L

JG15.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
JG15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
JG15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
JG15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 81
JG15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
JG15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

GLTS.L

GLTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
GLTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GLTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GLTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GLTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
GLTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JG15.L vs. GLTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist) (JG15.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JG15.L	GLTS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.59	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.30	-0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.30	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	1.53	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.92	7.19	-0.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JG15.L vs. GLTS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JG15.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the GLTS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JG15.L and GLTS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JG15.L	GLTS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.59	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.22	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.34	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between JG15.L and GLTS.L is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

JG15.L vs. GLTS.L - Dividend Comparison

JG15.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than GLTS.L's 3.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JG15.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist)	3.79%	3.71%	3.44%	2.28%	0.68%	0.12%	0.34%	0.91%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GLTS.L SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF	3.65%	3.44%	2.74%	1.30%	0.18%	0.13%	0.46%	0.60%	0.39%	0.52%	0.88%	0.98%

Drawdowns

JG15.L vs. GLTS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JG15.L drawdown since its inception was -11.35%, roughly equal to the maximum GLTS.L drawdown of -11.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JG15.L and GLTS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	JG15.L	GLTS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.35%	-11.18%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.35%	-2.22%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.68%	-10.44%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-11.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.57%	-1.43%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.44%	-1.73%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.50%	0.47%	+0.03%

Volatility

JG15.L vs. GLTS.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders UK Gilt 1-5 UCITS ETF - GBP (Dist) (JG15.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (GLTS.L) have volatilities of 1.28% and 1.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JG15.L	GLTS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	1.25%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.62%	1.68%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09%	2.22%	-0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.99%	3.20%	-0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.53%	2.59%	-0.06%