PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGM vs. VTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGM vs. VTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF (IBGM) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBGM

1D
-1.17%
1M
1.41%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTG

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGM vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBGM and VTG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGM vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF (IBGM) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBGM vs. VTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBGM vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGM drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, which is greater than VTG's maximum drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGM and VTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGMVTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-2.89%

-1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.43%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-0.80%

-0.29%

Volatility

IBGM vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGMVTGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.64%

3.54%

+5.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.64%

3.54%

+5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.64%

3.54%

+5.10%

IBGM vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGM has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBGM vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison

IBGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than VTG's 3.19% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IBGM and VTG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBGM.

VTG has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 0.80% for IBGM.

IBGM tracks ICE 2056 Maturity US Treasury Index, while VTG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGM and 0.03% for VTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGM and VTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer