IBGM vs. VGIT
IBGM (iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF) and VGIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - IBGM tracks the ICE 2056 Maturity US Treasury Index while VGIT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBGM charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VGIT.
Performance
IBGM vs. VGIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBGM
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VGIT
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- 1.15%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.15%
IBGM vs. VGIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBGM iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF | -1.12% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBGM and VGIT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBGM vs. VGIT — Risk / Return Rank
IBGM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGIT
IBGM vs. VGIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF (IBGM) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBGM | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBGM vs. VGIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBGM drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum VGIT drawdown of -16.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGM and VGIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBGM | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -16.05% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -2.34% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -3.51% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.14% | — |
Volatility
IBGM vs. VGIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBGM | VGIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.38% | 3.37% | +5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.38% | 5.39% | +2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.38% | 4.49% | +3.89% |
IBGM vs. VGIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBGM has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VGIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBGM vs. VGIT - Dividend Comparison
IBGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than VGIT's 3.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBGM iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | 3.88% | 3.79% | 3.67% | 2.73% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBGM and VGIT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBGM.
VGIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 1.23% for IBGM.
IBGM tracks ICE 2056 Maturity US Treasury Index, while VGIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGM and 0.03% for VGIT.
Find the right allocation for IBGM and VGIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer