IBGM vs. SLV
IBGM (iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IBGM is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2056 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBGM charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IBGM vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBGM
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- -8.08%
- 1M
- -12.21%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 89.74%
- 3Y*
- 41.68%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
IBGM vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBGM iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF | -0.16% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBGM and SLV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBGM vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IBGM
SLV
IBGM vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF (IBGM) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBGM | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.23 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
IBGM vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBGM drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGM and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBGM | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -76.28% | +71.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -41.70% | +40.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -44.67% | +43.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.98% | — |
Volatility
IBGM vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBGM | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 58.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.27% | 59.50% | -51.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.27% | 36.32% | -28.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.27% | 31.94% | -23.67% |
IBGM vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBGM has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBGM vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IBGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
IBGM iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF | 0.82% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBGM and SLV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBGM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBGM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IBGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IBGM is categorized as Government Bonds, while SLV is Silver. IBGM tracks ICE 2056 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGM and 0.50% for SLV.
Find the right allocation for IBGM and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer