PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGM vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGM vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF (IBGM) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBGM

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SLV

1D
-8.08%
1M
-12.21%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
16.28%
1Y
89.74%
3Y*
41.68%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
14.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGM vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBGM and SLV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGM vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGM

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGM vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2056 Term Treasury ETF (IBGM) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IBGM vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBGMSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.23

-0.34

Drawdowns

IBGM vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGM drawdown since its inception was -4.36%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGM and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGMSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-76.28%

+71.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-41.70%

+40.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.26%

-44.67%

+43.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.98%

Volatility

IBGM vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGMSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.27%

59.50%

-51.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.27%

36.32%

-28.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.27%

31.94%

-23.67%

IBGM vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGM has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBGM vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IBGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


IBGM and SLV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBGM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBGM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

IBGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IBGM is categorized as Government Bonds, while SLV is Silver. IBGM tracks ICE 2056 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGM and 0.50% for SLV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGM and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer