PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGL vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGL vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGL achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 97.64% return.


IBGL

1D
0.13%
1M
-4.07%
6M
-2.83%
YTD
-2.10%
1Y
0.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.86%

USO

1D
-2.01%
1M
25.05%
6M
84.84%
YTD
97.64%
1Y
82.62%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
22.54%
10Y*
5.42%
ALL TIME*
-6.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.72K$15.71K$16.10K
$1.02B$802.47M$996.79M

IBGL vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IBGL
iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF
-2.10%0.99%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
97.64%-7.56%

Correlation

The correlation between IBGL and USO is -0.38, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

-0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGL vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGL
IBGL Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IBGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGL Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGL Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGL vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBGLUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.30

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

2.46

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.45

6.41

-5.96

IBGL vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGL and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBGL vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGL drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGL and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGLUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.37%

-98.19%

+88.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-32.49%

+25.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.17%

-85.46%

+79.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-75.37%

+71.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

12.47%

-9.21%

Volatility

IBGL vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Treasury ETF (IBGL) is 1.88%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 13.60%. This indicates that IBGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGLUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

13.60%

-11.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.27%

41.19%

-34.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.86%

45.56%

-36.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.30%

36.67%

-26.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.30%

39.13%

-28.83%

IBGL vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGL has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBGL vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

IBGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


IBGL and USO have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to IBGL (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBGL dropped -9.37% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 1-year performance, USO leads with 82.62% vs 0.84% for IBGL. On fees, IBGL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBGL has been the lower-risk option at 1.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USO has performed better with a 82.62% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBGL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

IBGL has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

IBGL is categorized as Government Bonds, while USO is Oil & Gas. IBGL tracks ICE 2055 Maturity US Treasury Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGL and 0.86% for USO.

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGL and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer