PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGL.MI vs. VWRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGL.MI vs. VWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist (IBGL.MI) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBGL.MI is traded in EUR, while VWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VWRA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGL.MI achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than VWRA.L's 13.03% return.


IBGL.MI

1D
-0.95%
1M
1.07%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
-3.37%
3Y*
-0.04%
5Y*
-7.32%
10Y*
-2.10%

VWRA.L

1D
-0.45%
1M
5.46%
YTD
13.03%
6M
13.93%
1Y
26.88%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGL.MI vs. VWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBGL.MI
iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist
-0.06%-5.53%-0.17%10.21%-34.75%-7.00%11.97%-0.51%
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
13.03%7.92%25.41%18.61%-13.03%27.32%6.62%6.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IBGL.MI and VWRA.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019

0.03

Over the past year, IBGL.MI and VWRA.L have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGL.MI vs. VWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGL.MI
IBGL.MI Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IBGL.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGL.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGL.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGL.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGL.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRA.L
VWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGL.MI vs. VWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist (IBGL.MI) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBGL.MIVWRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.40

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

4.19

-4.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

16.05

-17.03

IBGL.MI vs. VWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGL.MI Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGL.MI and VWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBGL.MIVWRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

2.17

-2.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.54

0.84

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.76

-0.49

Drawdowns

IBGL.MI vs. VWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGL.MI drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, which is greater than VWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGL.MI and VWRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGL.MIVWRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.83%

-33.09%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.26%

-6.39%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.10%

-20.09%

+7.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.23%

-20.09%

-22.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.45%

-0.45%

-37.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.22%

-4.69%

-7.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

1.67%

+1.77%

Volatility

IBGL.MI vs. VWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist (IBGL.MI) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) at 3.51%. This indicates that IBGL.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGL.MIVWRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.51%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.20%

9.30%

-2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.28%

12.38%

-3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

14.58%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.50%

16.77%

-5.27%

IBGL.MI vs. VWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGL.MI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRA.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBGL.MI vs. VWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

IBGL.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, while VWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBGL.MI
iShares € Govt Bond 15-30yr UCITS ETF EUR Dist
3.68%3.53%3.18%2.66%1.32%0.53%0.74%1.27%1.50%1.35%1.48%1.83%
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBGL.MI and VWRA.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBGL.MI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBGL.MI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.

IBGL.MI is categorized as European Government Bonds, while VWRA.L is Global Equities. IBGL.MI tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 30 Year Term Index, while VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IBGL.MI and 0.22% for VWRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGL.MI and VWRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer