IBGK vs. SLV
IBGK (iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Treasury ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IBGK is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the ICE 2054 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBGK returned 4.74% vs 110.59% for SLV. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBGK charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IBGK vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBGK achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return.
IBGK
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- -1.89%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
IBGK vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBGK iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Treasury ETF | -0.36% | 3.66% | -2.73% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | -2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBGK and SLV is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBGK vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IBGK
SLV
IBGK vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Treasury ETF (IBGK) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBGK | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 2.62 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.63 | 5.64 | -4.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBGK | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 1.89 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.25 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
IBGK vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBGK drawdown since its inception was -14.62%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGK and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBGK | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.62% | -76.28% | +61.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.29% | -42.45% | +35.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.19% | -37.30% | +28.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -44.67% | +36.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 19.67% | -16.75% |
Volatility
IBGK vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Treasury ETF (IBGK) is 2.70%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IBGK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBGK | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 16.30% | -13.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.20% | 58.31% | -52.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.36% | 58.90% | -49.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 36.15% | -24.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 31.84% | -20.03% |
IBGK vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBGK has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBGK vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IBGK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IBGK iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Treasury ETF | 4.72% | 4.59% | 3.15% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBGK and SLV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IBGK (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBGK dropped -14.62% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 1-year performance, SLV leads with 110.59% vs 4.74% for IBGK. On fees, IBGK is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBGK has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SLV has performed better with a 110.59% return vs 4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBGK is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IBGK has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IBGK is categorized as Long-Term Bond, while SLV is Silver. IBGK tracks ICE 2054 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGK and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBGK and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer