PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGIX vs. MMGPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGIX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VY Baron Growth Portfolio (IBGIX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGIX achieves a -11.78% return, which is significantly lower than MMGPX's 6.58% return.


IBGIX

1D
-1.90%
1M
2.40%
YTD
-11.78%
6M
-11.41%
1Y
-17.18%
3Y*
-4.22%
5Y*
-3.41%
10Y*
14.99%

MMGPX

1D
-1.64%
1M
5.85%
YTD
6.58%
6M
2.50%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
-3.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGIX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBGIX
VY Baron Growth Portfolio
-11.78%-10.40%4.84%15.02%-23.40%20.76%33.55%166.57%-1.63%26.07%
MMGPX
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio
6.58%12.58%41.83%44.34%-63.37%-11.55%152.67%40.20%10.89%28.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IBGIX and MMGPX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between IBGIX and MMGPX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGIX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGIX
IBGIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IBGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MMGPX
MMGPX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MMGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MMGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGIX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VY Baron Growth Portfolio (IBGIX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBGIXMMGPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.06

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

0.22

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.40

0.47

-1.86

IBGIX vs. MMGPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the MMGPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGIX and MMGPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBGIXMMGPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

0.22

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

-0.09

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.46

-0.16

Drawdowns

IBGIX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGIX drawdown since its inception was -57.44%, smaller than the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGIX and MMGPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGIXMMGPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.44%

-75.38%

+17.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.51%

-27.79%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.02%

-29.27%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.38%

-72.70%

+38.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.98%

-36.32%

+8.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.14%

-30.24%

+16.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.45%

13.11%

-0.66%

Volatility

IBGIX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VY Baron Growth Portfolio (IBGIX) is 6.55%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that IBGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGIXMMGPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

8.88%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.78%

20.96%

-7.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

27.57%

-9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.78%

39.71%

-18.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.99%

35.22%

+0.77%

IBGIX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBGIX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison

IBGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 77.27%, more than MMGPX's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBGIX
VY Baron Growth Portfolio
77.27%24.66%4.13%5.23%11.56%6.89%0.00%107.13%11.51%12.13%11.71%8.93%
MMGPX
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio
0.40%0.43%0.00%0.00%125.40%64.53%7.93%15.63%28.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBGIX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMGPX has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to IBGIX (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBGIX dropped -57.44% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.

MMGPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGIX and MMGPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer