IBGC vs. SLV

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

IBGC (iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IBGC is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2046 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBGC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.

Performance

IBGC vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF (IBGC) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IBGC

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 2.56%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLV

• 1D: 1.76%
• 1M: -21.07%
• YTD: -17.29%
• 6M: -25.08%
• 1Y: 59.81%
• 3Y*: 36.43%
• 5Y*: 17.12%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGC vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IBGC iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF	2.82%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	-18.29%

Correlation

The correlation between IBGC and SLV is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026	0.29

Return for Risk

IBGC vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SLV

SLV Risk / Return Rank: 28
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGC vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF (IBGC) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBGC	SLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.99	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.41	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.18	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.66	—

Drawdowns

IBGC vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGC and SLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBGC	SLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.29%	-76.28%	+71.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-50.97%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.97%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-49.55%	+49.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.14%	-44.66%	+43.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	22.58%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBGC	SLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	59.51%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.43%	60.78%	-52.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.43%	36.73%	-28.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.43%	32.16%	-23.73%

IBGC vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBGC vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IBGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
IBGC iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF	0.79%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBGC and SLV in my portfolio?

IBGC and SLV have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IBGC or SLV?

On fees, IBGC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBGC or SLV?

IBGC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBGC or SLV?

IBGC has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

What is the main difference between IBGC and SLV?

IBGC is categorized as Government Bonds, while SLV is Silver. IBGC tracks ICE 2046 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGC and 0.50% for SLV.