IBGC vs. SCHQ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IBGC (iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF) and SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - IBGC tracks the ICE 2046 Maturity US Treasury Index while SCHQ tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IBGC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHQ.

Performance

IBGC vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF (IBGC) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IBGC

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -1.61%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHQ

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -1.71%
• 6M: -2.20%
• YTD: -1.12%
• 1Y: 3.93%
• 3Y*: -0.82%
• 5Y*: -6.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGC vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IBGC iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF	-0.01%
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	-1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IBGC and SCHQ is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026	0.97

Return for Risk

IBGC vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCHQ

SCHQ Risk / Return Rank: 17
SCHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SCHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
SCHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SCHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
SCHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGC vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF (IBGC) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBGC	SCHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.46	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.08	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.56	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.33	—

Drawdowns

IBGC vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGC and SCHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBGC	SCHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.29%	-46.13%	+41.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.01%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	-37.25%	+34.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.33%	-26.53%	+25.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBGC	SCHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.33%	8.53%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.33%	14.46%	-6.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.33%	15.24%	-6.91%

IBGC vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IBGC vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison

IBGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than SCHQ's 4.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IBGC iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF	1.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	4.81%	4.54%	4.58%	3.79%	2.88%	1.69%	1.51%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBGC and SCHQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, IBGC and SCHQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, IBGC or SCHQ?

On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBGC or SCHQ?

SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBGC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBGC or SCHQ?

SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 1.21% for IBGC.

What is the main difference between IBGC and SCHQ?

IBGC tracks ICE 2046 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGC and 0.03% for SCHQ.