PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGC vs. GOVZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGC vs. GOVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF (IBGC) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IBGC

1D
0.10%
1M
2.56%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOVZ

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.92%
YTD
3.01%
6M
1.69%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
-7.02%
5Y*
-11.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGC vs. GOVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBGC and GOVZ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGC vs. GOVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GOVZ
GOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGC vs. GOVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF (IBGC) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBGCGOVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.44

IBGC vs. GOVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBGC vs. GOVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum GOVZ drawdown of -59.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGC and GOVZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGCGOVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-59.65%

+55.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-54.73%

+54.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.14%

-40.06%

+38.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.53%

Volatility

IBGC vs. GOVZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGCGOVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.43%

15.86%

-7.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.43%

23.86%

-15.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.43%

23.28%

-14.85%

IBGC vs. GOVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GOVZ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBGC vs. GOVZ - Dividend Comparison

IBGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than GOVZ's 4.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GOVZ
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF
4.98%5.00%4.68%3.84%3.69%1.76%0.39%
IBGC
iShares iBonds Dec 2046 Term Treasury ETF
0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, IBGC and GOVZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IBGC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBGC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GOVZ.

GOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 0.79% for IBGC.

IBGC tracks ICE 2046 Maturity US Treasury Index, while GOVZ tracks ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGC and 0.15% for GOVZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGC and GOVZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer