IBGB vs. YCS
IBGB (iShares iBonds Dec 2045 Term Treasury ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - IBGB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2045 Maturity US Treasury Index, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBGB returned 4.04% vs 34.99% for YCS. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. IBGB charges 0.07%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
IBGB vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBGB achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return.
IBGB
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 34.99%
- 3Y*
- 20.03%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
IBGB vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBGB iShares iBonds Dec 2045 Term Treasury ETF | -0.23% | 2.71% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.17% | 14.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBGB and YCS is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.34 |
The correlation between IBGB and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.45 (1 year) to -0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBGB vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
IBGB
YCS
IBGB vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2045 Term Treasury ETF (IBGB) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBGB | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.38 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 4.23 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 13.22 | -11.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBGB | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 2.06 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.33 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
IBGB vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBGB drawdown since its inception was -8.09%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGB and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBGB | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.09% | -49.56% | +41.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | -8.30% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | 0.00% | -4.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -19.93% | +16.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 2.65% | -0.13% |
Volatility
IBGB vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2045 Term Treasury ETF (IBGB) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) have volatilities of 2.58% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBGB | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 2.62% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.79% | 12.31% | -6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.44% | 17.18% | -8.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.52% | 21.09% | -11.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.52% | 19.01% | -9.49% |
IBGB vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBGB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBGB vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
IBGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IBGB iShares iBonds Dec 2045 Term Treasury ETF | 4.63% | 3.53% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBGB and YCS have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to IBGB (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBGB dropped -8.09% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 34.99% vs 4.04% for IBGB. On fees, IBGB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 34.99% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBGB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
IBGB has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
IBGB is categorized as Government Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. IBGB tracks ICE 2045 Maturity US Treasury Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGB and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBGB and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer