PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBGA vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBGA vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBGA achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 10.06% return.


IBGA

1D
0.16%
1M
1.86%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.38%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.39%
1M
3.97%
YTD
10.06%
6M
11.27%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
23.65%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBGA vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBGA
iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF
0.45%6.09%-2.18%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
10.06%9.04%3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IBGA and YCS is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2024

-0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBGA vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGA
IBGA Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IBGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGA Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGA Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBGA vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBGAYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.38

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

4.14

-3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

13.04

-11.40

IBGA vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBGA Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBGA and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBGA vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBGA drawdown since its inception was -11.69%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBGA and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBGAYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.69%

-49.56%

+37.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-8.30%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

0.00%

-3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-19.87%

+14.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.63%

-0.09%

Volatility

IBGA vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA) is 1.97%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that IBGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBGAYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

2.25%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.80%

11.91%

-6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.00%

16.93%

-8.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.82%

21.10%

-11.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.82%

18.82%

-9.00%

IBGA vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBGA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBGA vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

IBGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
IBGA
iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF
4.62%4.49%2.03%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBGA and YCS have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to IBGA (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBGA dropped -11.69% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 34.18% vs 4.16% for IBGA. On fees, IBGA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBGA has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 34.18% return vs 4.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBGA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

IBGA has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

IBGA is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. IBGA tracks ICE 2044 Maturity US Treasury Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBGA and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBGA and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer