PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDY vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDY vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF (IBDY) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDY achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.55% return.


IBDY

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
0.14%
1Y
5.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SGOV

1D
0.03%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.79%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDY vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBDY
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF
-0.23%9.41%2.02%5.75%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.55%4.24%5.27%2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDY and SGOV is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

-0.02

The correlation between IBDY and SGOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDY vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDY
IBDY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IBDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDY Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDY vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF (IBDY) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBDYSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-275.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

196.55

-195.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

400.29

-398.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.14

4,485.40

-4,479.26

IBDY vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDY and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBDYSGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

20.34

-19.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

14.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

12.50

-11.60

Drawdowns

IBDY vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDY drawdown since its inception was -7.53%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDY and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDYSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-0.03%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-0.01%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

0.00%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-0.00%

-1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.00%

+0.89%

Volatility

IBDY vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF (IBDY) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that IBDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDYSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

0.06%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

0.13%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18%

0.20%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

0.24%

+6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.35%

0.24%

+6.11%

IBDY vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDY has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDY vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

IBDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBDY
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corporate ETF
4.91%4.87%5.02%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDY and SGOV have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBDY has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDY dropped -7.53% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 1-year performance, IBDY leads with 5.45% vs 3.97% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBDY has performed better with a 5.45% return vs 3.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBDY.

IBDY has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 3.85% for SGOV.

IBDY is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. IBDY tracks Bloomberg December 2033 Maturity Corporate Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDY and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.34 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDY and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer