IBDW vs. FFUT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IBDW (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDW is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. IBDW is passively managed, while FFUT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. IBDW charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.

Performance

IBDW vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDW achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 12.74% return.

IBDW

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 0.14%
• 6M: 0.26%
• 1Y: 5.40%
• 3Y*: 5.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFUT

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDW vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF	0.14%	5.14%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	12.74%	8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDW and FFUT is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	-0.34

Return for Risk

IBDW vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDW

IBDW Risk / Return Rank: 46
IBDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
IBDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
IBDW Omega Ratio Rank: 44
IBDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
IBDW Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDW vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBDW	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.54	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBDW	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	2.01	-1.94

Drawdowns

IBDW vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDW drawdown since its inception was -23.87%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -2.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDW and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBDW	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.87%	-2.84%	-21.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-0.90%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.47%	-0.88%	-8.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBDW	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.42%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52%	11.17%	-7.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.26%	11.17%	-3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.26%	11.17%	-3.91%

IBDW vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDW has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBDW vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

IBDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than FFUT's 1.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.85%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF	4.79%	4.78%	5.00%	4.50%	3.70%	1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBDW and FFUT in my portfolio?

IBDW and FFUT have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IBDW or FFUT?

On fees, IBDW is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBDW or FFUT?

IBDW is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBDW or FFUT?

IBDW has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 1.85% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between IBDW and FFUT?

IBDW is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDW and 0.80% for FFUT.