IBDW vs. BSCQ
IBDW (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - IBDW tracks the Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index while BSCQ tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBDW returned 5.87%/yr vs 5.06%/yr for BSCQ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
IBDW vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDW achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.55% return.
IBDW
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
IBDW vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF | 0.14% | 9.07% | 2.96% | 9.40% | -17.13% | 0.36% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.55% | 5.02% | 4.86% | 5.71% | -8.31% | -0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDW and BSCQ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IBDW and BSCQ has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDW vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
IBDW
BSCQ
IBDW vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBDW | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -12.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 3.45 | -2.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 43.24 | -41.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | 179.65 | -172.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDW | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 7.06 | -5.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.60 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
IBDW vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDW drawdown since its inception was -23.87%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDW and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDW | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.87% | -16.50% | -7.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.42% | -0.10% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.61% | -1.13% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | 0.00% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.47% | -2.85% | -6.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 0.02% | +0.70% |
Volatility
IBDW vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF (IBDW) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.17%. This indicates that IBDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDW | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 0.17% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.42% | 0.43% | +1.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 0.63% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 3.30% | +3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 4.77% | +2.49% |
IBDW vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBDW and BSCQ have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBDW vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
IBDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than BSCQ's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
IBDW iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Corporate ETF | 4.79% | 4.78% | 5.00% | 4.50% | 3.70% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDW and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBDW has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to BSCQ (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDW dropped -23.87% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.
On 3-year performance, IBDW leads with 5.87% vs 5.06% for BSCQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IBDW has performed better with a 5.87% return vs 5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBDW and BSCQ have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
IBDW has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.12% for BSCQ.
IBDW tracks Bloomberg December 2031 Maturity Corporate Index, while BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.06 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBDW and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer