PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDV vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDV vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (IBDV) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDV achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -19.62% return.


IBDV

1D
0.23%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.60%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*

SLV

1D
-7.09%
1M
-24.25%
YTD
-19.62%
6M
-20.61%
1Y
58.79%
3Y*
36.01%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDV vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBDV
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF
0.55%8.19%3.42%8.51%-14.67%-2.64%5.22%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-19.62%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%50.92%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDV and SLV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDV vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDV
IBDV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IBDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDV Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDV vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (IBDV) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBDVSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.22

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.16

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.39

2.66

+3.73

IBDV vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDV and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBDV vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDV drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDV and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDVSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.85%

-76.28%

+54.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.07%

-50.97%

+48.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.64%

-50.97%

+45.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.54%

-50.97%

+29.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-50.97%

+50.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.16%

-44.66%

+37.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

22.14%

-21.51%

Volatility

IBDV vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (IBDV) is 0.89%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 15.67%. This indicates that IBDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDVSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

15.67%

-14.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

59.65%

-57.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

60.78%

-57.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.43%

36.73%

-30.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.24%

32.16%

-25.92%

IBDV vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBDV vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IBDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBDV
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF
4.59%4.57%4.69%4.09%3.02%1.99%0.90%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDV and SLV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to IBDV (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDV dropped -21.85% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 5-year performance, SLV leads with 16.45% vs 0.88% for IBDV. On fees, IBDV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDV has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SLV has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 0.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBDV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

IBDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IBDV is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SLV is Silver. IBDV tracks Bloomberg December 2030 Maturity Corporate Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDV and 0.50% for SLV.

IBDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDV and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer