IBDV vs. IVES
IBDV (iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF) and IVES (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDV is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2030 Maturity Corporate Index, while IVES is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IVES.
Performance
IBDV vs. IVES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDV achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than IVES's 27.14% return.
IBDV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 5.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- —
IVES
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- 18.28%
- YTD
- 27.14%
- 6M
- 24.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBDV vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBDV iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF | 0.30% | 4.16% |
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 27.14% | 25.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDV and IVES is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDV vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank
IBDV
IVES
IBDV vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (IBDV) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBDV | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDV | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 2.32 | -2.15 |
Drawdowns
IBDV vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDV drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, roughly equal to the maximum IVES drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDV and IVES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDV | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -22.64% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -3.69% | +2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -5.63% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | — | — |
Volatility
IBDV vs. IVES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDV | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91% | 25.77% | -22.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 25.77% | -19.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.27% | 25.77% | -19.50% |
IBDV vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IVES's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBDV vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison
IBDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than IVES's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDV iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF | 4.60% | 4.57% | 4.69% | 4.09% | 3.02% | 1.99% | 0.90% |
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 0.33% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDV and IVES have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBDV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBDV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.
IBDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.33% for IVES.
IBDV is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IVES is Technology Equities. IBDV tracks Bloomberg December 2030 Maturity Corporate Index, while IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDV and 0.75% for IVES.
Find the right allocation for IBDV and IVES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer