PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDU vs. VCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDU vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDU achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than VCSH's 0.64% return.


IBDU

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.88%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*

VCSH

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.59%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDU vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBDU
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF
0.54%7.59%3.62%8.67%-13.04%-2.05%10.38%2.22%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.64%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%5.13%1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDU and VCSH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019

0.85

The correlation between IBDU and VCSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDU vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDU
IBDU Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IBDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDU Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDU Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDU vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBDUVCSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

2.45

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

3.85

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.48

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.29

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.33

13.55

-2.22

IBDU vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDU Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDU and VCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBDUVCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.45

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.81

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.02

-0.69

Drawdowns

IBDU vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDU drawdown since its inception was -19.44%, which is greater than VCSH's maximum drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDU and VCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDUVCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.44%

-12.86%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

-1.40%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.14%

-1.40%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

-9.48%

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.32%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-0.97%

-4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.34%

+0.08%

Volatility

IBDU vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) have volatilities of 0.58% and 0.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDUVCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

0.57%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.49%

1.38%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26%

1.88%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

2.88%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.32%

3.35%

+3.97%

IBDU vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDU vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

IBDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than VCSH's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBDU
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF
4.66%4.67%4.75%4.21%3.34%2.29%2.42%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.45%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IBDU and VCSH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBDU has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to VCSH (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDU dropped -19.44% vs VCSH's -12.86%.

On 5-year performance, VCSH leads with 2.32% vs 1.29% for IBDU. On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VCSH has performed better with a 2.32% return vs 1.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBDU.

IBDU has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 4.45% for VCSH.

IBDU tracks Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index, while VCSH tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDU and 0.04% for VCSH.

VCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDU and VCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer