IBDU vs. SWDA.L
IBDU (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDU is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBDU returned 1.13%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for SWDA.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDU charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
IBDU vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBDU is traded in USD, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDU achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 8.34% return.
IBDU
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 8.34%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
IBDU vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDU iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF | 0.71% | 7.59% | 3.62% | 8.67% | -13.04% | -2.05% | 10.38% | 2.35% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.34% | 21.14% | 19.09% | 23.79% | -18.13% | 22.52% | 15.68% | 8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDU and SWDA.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDU vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBDU
SWDA.L
IBDU vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBDU | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.35 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.66 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.78 | 11.48 | -0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBDU vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDU drawdown since its inception was -19.44%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDU and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDU | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.44% | -45.69% | +26.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.59% | -8.59% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.14% | -17.07% | +12.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.44% | -26.50% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -1.75% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -11.21% | +5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 2.00% | -1.57% |
Volatility
IBDU vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) is 0.64%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that IBDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDU | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 3.28% | -2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.53% | 8.94% | -7.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21% | 11.67% | -9.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 15.35% | -9.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.30% | 15.83% | -8.53% |
IBDU vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBDU vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
IBDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDU iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF | 4.66% | 4.67% | 4.75% | 4.21% | 3.34% | 2.29% | 2.42% | 0.74% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDU and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBDU is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBDU is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
IBDU is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. IBDU tracks Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDU and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for IBDU and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer