PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDT vs. TDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDT vs. TDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) and TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDT achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly higher than TDG's -5.68% return.


IBDT

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.02%
6M
0.85%
YTD
1.18%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
5.62%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.89%

TDG

1D
0.36%
1M
-6.98%
6M
-12.13%
YTD
-5.68%
1Y
-15.42%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
18.68%
10Y*
21.90%
ALL TIME*
27.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.99M$16.78M$15.59M
$415.00M$410.74M$481.88M

IBDT vs. TDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBDT
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF
1.18%7.02%3.97%7.72%-11.42%-1.90%9.62%15.15%1.47%
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
-5.68%12.15%32.27%66.57%1.77%2.82%10.51%84.41%-7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDT and TDG is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDT vs. TDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBDT
IBDT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IBDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TDG
TDG Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBDT vs. TDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) and TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBDTTDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

0.92

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

-0.68

+4.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.60

-1.09

+18.70

IBDT vs. TDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the TDG Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDT and TDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBDT vs. TDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDT drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum TDG drawdown of -62.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDT and TDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDTTDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-62.64%

+44.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.03%

-24.75%

+23.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.94%

-25.30%

+22.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.61%

-25.30%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-17.29%

+17.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-8.00%

+3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

15.25%

-15.03%

Volatility

IBDT vs. TDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) is 0.44%, while TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that IBDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDTTDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

9.21%

-8.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.15%

23.26%

-22.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59%

29.58%

-27.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.03%

28.02%

-22.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.31%

33.93%

-27.62%

Dividends

IBDT vs. TDG - Dividend Comparison

IBDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than TDG's 7.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
IBDT
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF
4.14%4.56%4.67%4.10%3.25%2.45%2.80%3.32%1.47%0.00%0.00%
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
7.17%6.77%5.92%3.46%2.94%0.00%0.00%11.16%0.00%8.01%9.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDT and TDG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDG has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to IBDT (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDT dropped -17.79% vs TDG's -62.64%.

IBDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDT and TDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer