PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBDT vs. CE31.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBDT vs. CE31.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) and iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBDT is traded in USD, while CE31.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CE31.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBDT achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than CE31.L's -1.10% return.


IBDT

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.78%
6M
1.15%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
1.39%
10Y*

CE31.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
-1.10%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
5.42%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
0.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBDT vs. CE31.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBDT
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF
0.78%7.02%3.97%7.72%-11.42%-1.90%9.62%15.15%1.19%
CE31.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
-1.10%15.67%-3.25%6.81%-9.44%-8.45%8.62%-0.98%-2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between IBDT and CE31.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2018

0.28

The correlation between IBDT and CE31.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBDT vs. CE31.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBDT
IBDT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IBDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CE31.L
CE31.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CE31.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CE31.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CE31.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CE31.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CE31.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBDT vs. CE31.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) and iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBDTCE31.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.81

0.42

+2.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.50

0.66

+3.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.08

+0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

0.52

+3.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.21

1.32

+18.89

IBDT vs. CE31.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the CE31.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBDT and CE31.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBDTCE31.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

0.42

+2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

-0.02

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

-0.04

+0.65

Drawdowns

IBDT vs. CE31.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBDT drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum CE31.L drawdown of -33.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDT and CE31.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDTCE31.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-33.98%

+16.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.03%

-5.51%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.19%

-8.15%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.68%

-25.51%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-12.27%

+12.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-16.48%

+12.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

2.17%

-1.94%

Volatility

IBDT vs. CE31.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) is 0.34%, while iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that IBDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CE31.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDTCE31.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.34%

1.85%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.04%

4.99%

-3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62%

6.80%

-5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.07%

8.20%

-3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.37%

8.04%

-1.67%

IBDT vs. CE31.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBDT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CE31.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBDT vs. CE31.L - Dividend Comparison

IBDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, while CE31.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CE31.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBDT
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF
4.55%4.56%4.67%4.10%3.25%2.45%2.80%3.32%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBDT and CE31.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBDT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBDT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CE31.L.

IBDT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while CE31.L is European Government Bonds. IBDT tracks Bloomberg December 2028 Maturity Corporate Index, while CE31.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDT and 0.15% for CE31.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBDT and CE31.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer