IBDT vs. CE31.L
IBDT (iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF) and CE31.L (iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IBDT is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2028 Maturity Corporate Index, while CE31.L is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBDT returned 1.39%/yr vs -0.14%/yr for CE31.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBDT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CE31.L.
Performance
IBDT vs. CE31.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBDT is traded in USD, while CE31.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CE31.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDT achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than CE31.L's -1.10% return.
IBDT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 1.39%
- 10Y*
- —
CE31.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.14%
- 10Y*
- 0.59%
IBDT vs. CE31.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDT iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF | 0.78% | 7.02% | 3.97% | 7.72% | -11.42% | -1.90% | 9.62% | 15.15% | 1.19% |
CE31.L iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | -1.10% | 15.67% | -3.25% | 6.81% | -9.44% | -8.45% | 8.62% | -0.98% | -2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDT and CE31.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2018 | 0.28 |
The correlation between IBDT and CE31.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDT vs. CE31.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBDT
CE31.L
IBDT vs. CE31.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) and iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBDT | CE31.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.81 | 0.42 | +2.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.50 | 0.66 | +3.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.08 | +0.51 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.44 | 0.52 | +3.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.21 | 1.32 | +18.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDT | CE31.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 0.42 | +2.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | -0.02 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | -0.04 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
IBDT vs. CE31.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDT drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum CE31.L drawdown of -33.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDT and CE31.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDT | CE31.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -33.98% | +16.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.03% | -5.51% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.19% | -8.15% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.68% | -25.51% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -12.27% | +12.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -16.48% | +12.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 2.17% | -1.94% |
Volatility
IBDT vs. CE31.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF (IBDT) is 0.34%, while iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that IBDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CE31.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDT | CE31.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.34% | 1.85% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.04% | 4.99% | -3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62% | 6.80% | -5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.07% | 8.20% | -3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.37% | 8.04% | -1.67% |
IBDT vs. CE31.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBDT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CE31.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBDT vs. CE31.L - Dividend Comparison
IBDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, while CE31.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CE31.L iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBDT iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF | 4.55% | 4.56% | 4.67% | 4.10% | 3.25% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 3.32% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDT and CE31.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBDT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBDT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CE31.L.
IBDT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while CE31.L is European Government Bonds. IBDT tracks Bloomberg December 2028 Maturity Corporate Index, while CE31.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBDT and 0.15% for CE31.L.
Find the right allocation for IBDT and CE31.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer