IBDRY vs. TAN
IBDRY (Iberdrola SA) is a stock, while TAN (Invesco Solar ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MAC Global Solar Energy Index. Over the past 10 years, IBDRY returned 18.51%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for TAN. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBDRY vs. TAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBDRY achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than TAN's 43.10% return. Over the past 10 years, IBDRY has outperformed TAN with an annualized return of 18.51%, while TAN has yielded a comparatively lower 13.50% annualized return.
IBDRY
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 6.44%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 29.97%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- 17.04%
- 10Y*
- 18.51%
TAN
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- 20.40%
- YTD
- 43.10%
- 6M
- 48.35%
- 1Y
- 112.42%
- 3Y*
- -0.64%
- 5Y*
- -1.65%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
IBDRY vs. TAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDRY Iberdrola SA | 6.44% | 65.75% | 10.02% | 17.36% | 3.59% | -15.13% | 44.34% | 33.28% | 7.72% | 27.83% |
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 43.10% | 48.31% | -37.61% | -26.79% | -5.24% | -25.10% | 233.96% | 66.53% | -25.67% | 54.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBDRY and TAN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2008 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IBDRY and TAN has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBDRY vs. TAN — Risk / Return Rank
IBDRY
TAN
IBDRY vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Iberdrola SA (IBDRY) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBDRY | TAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.44 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 8.30 | -5.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 20.09 | -11.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBDRY | TAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 3.05 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | -0.04 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.36 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | -0.12 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
IBDRY vs. TAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBDRY drawdown since its inception was -77.08%, smaller than the maximum TAN drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBDRY and TAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBDRY | TAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.08% | -95.29% | +18.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -13.62% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.11% | -64.40% | +45.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.11% | -73.95% | +45.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.43% | -78.53% | +41.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -67.72% | +61.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.49% | -78.51% | +49.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 5.62% | -2.11% |
Volatility
IBDRY vs. TAN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Iberdrola SA (IBDRY) is 5.14%, while Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a volatility of 12.15%. This indicates that IBDRY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBDRY | TAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 12.15% | -7.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.51% | 25.32% | -11.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.62% | 37.29% | -19.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 39.74% | -18.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 37.98% | -14.55% |
Dividends
IBDRY vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison
IBDRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, while TAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBDRY Iberdrola SA | 3.46% | 4.18% | 4.38% | 4.11% | 4.14% | 3.77% | 2.83% | 3.01% | 3.76% | 7.28% | 10.00% | 1.71% |
TAN Invesco Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.69% | 1.77% | 5.04% | 1.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBDRY and TAN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAN has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to IBDRY (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBDRY dropped -77.08% vs TAN's -95.29%.
TAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBDRY and TAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer