PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBD vs. VCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBD vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF (IBD) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBD achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than VCSH's 0.72% return.


IBD

1D
0.06%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.72%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*

VCSH

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.11%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBD vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBD
Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF
0.01%7.70%3.58%6.00%-8.94%-1.89%5.15%7.97%-1.18%1.32%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.72%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%5.13%7.02%0.92%0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between IBD and VCSH is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2017

0.57

The correlation between IBD and VCSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBD vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBD
IBD Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBD vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF (IBD) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBDVCSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

2.48

-1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

3.90

-2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.49

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.27

-1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.71

13.54

-6.83

IBD vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBD and VCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBDVCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

2.48

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.82

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

1.02

-0.71

Drawdowns

IBD vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBD drawdown since its inception was -16.30%, which is greater than VCSH's maximum drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBD and VCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBDVCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.30%

-12.86%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.15%

-1.40%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.01%

-1.40%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.76%

-9.48%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.24%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.36%

-0.97%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.34%

+0.35%

Volatility

IBD vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF (IBD) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) at 0.57%. This indicates that IBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBDVCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.57%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

1.38%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.21%

1.88%

+2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.60%

2.88%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.71%

3.35%

+3.36%

IBD vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBD vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

IBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than VCSH's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBD
Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF
4.25%4.17%4.18%3.39%1.75%1.36%1.63%2.47%2.06%0.82%0.00%0.00%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.45%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBD and VCSH have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBD has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to VCSH (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBD dropped -16.30% vs VCSH's -12.86%.

On 5-year performance, VCSH leads with 2.36% vs 1.36% for IBD. On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VCSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VCSH has performed better with a 2.36% return vs 1.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IBD.

VCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 4.25% for IBD.

IBD tracks Inspire Corporate Bond Impact Equal Weight Index, while VCSH tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IBD and 0.04% for VCSH.

VCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBD and VCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer