IBD vs. BBCB
IBD (Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF) and BBCB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - IBD tracks the Inspire Corporate Bond Impact Equal Weight Index while BBCB tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBD returned 1.30%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for BBCB. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for BBCB.
Performance
IBD vs. BBCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBD achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than BBCB's 2.82% return.
IBD
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- —
BBCB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 8.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
IBD vs. BBCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBD Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF | -0.18% | 7.70% | 3.58% | 6.00% | -8.94% | -1.89% | 5.15% | 7.97% | 0.58% |
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 2.82% | 7.69% | 1.97% | 8.42% | -15.72% | -2.23% | 10.39% | 14.86% | 0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBD and BBCB is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between IBD and BBCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBD vs. BBCB — Risk / Return Rank
IBD
BBCB
IBD vs. BBCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF (IBD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBD | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.34 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 2.85 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.66 | 10.09 | -3.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBD | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.71 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.12 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.46 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
IBD vs. BBCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBD drawdown since its inception was -16.30%, smaller than the maximum BBCB drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBD and BBCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBD | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.30% | -22.48% | +6.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.15% | -2.95% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.01% | -6.46% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.76% | -22.32% | +7.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -0.34% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -6.66% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.83% | -0.14% |
Volatility
IBD vs. BBCB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF (IBD) is 1.03%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that IBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBD | BBCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 1.41% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.83% | 3.98% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 4.93% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.60% | 7.25% | -1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.70% | 7.50% | -0.80% |
IBD vs. BBCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCB's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBD vs. BBCB - Dividend Comparison
IBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than BBCB's 7.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 7.15% | 5.02% | 5.22% | 4.22% | 3.39% | 3.47% | 4.59% | 5.25% | 0.20% | 0.00% |
IBD Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF | 4.25% | 4.17% | 4.18% | 3.39% | 1.75% | 1.36% | 1.63% | 2.47% | 2.06% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBD and BBCB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBCB has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to IBD (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBD dropped -16.30% vs BBCB's -22.48%.
On 5-year performance, IBD leads with 1.30% vs 0.84% for BBCB. On fees, BBCB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBD has performed better with a 1.30% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBCB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IBD.
BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 4.25% for IBD.
IBD tracks Inspire Corporate Bond Impact Equal Weight Index, while BBCB tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IBD and 0.09% for BBCB.
BBCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBD and BBCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer