IBCZ.DE vs. SNAW.DE
IBCZ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SNAW.DE (iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - IBCZ.DE tracks the MSCI World Diversified Multiple-Factor while SNAW.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Screened. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBCZ.DE returned 12.00%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for SNAW.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBCZ.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SNAW.DE.
Performance
IBCZ.DE vs. SNAW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCZ.DE achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than SNAW.DE's 10.75% return.
IBCZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- 1Y
- 27.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
SNAW.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCZ.DE vs. SNAW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCZ.DE iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 13.04% | 12.05% | 24.09% | 11.45% | -10.83% | 31.27% | 0.44% | 24.79% | -8.47% |
SNAW.DE iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.75% | 7.91% | 27.45% | 22.43% | -15.24% | 33.21% | 6.88% | 31.54% | -19.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCZ.DE and SNAW.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between IBCZ.DE and SNAW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCZ.DE vs. SNAW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCZ.DE
SNAW.DE
IBCZ.DE vs. SNAW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) and iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCZ.DE | SNAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.38 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.23 | 3.15 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.97 | 12.49 | +8.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCZ.DE | SNAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.05 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.90 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.69 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
IBCZ.DE vs. SNAW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum SNAW.DE drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCZ.DE and SNAW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCZ.DE | SNAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -33.26% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | -7.69% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.98% | -22.37% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.98% | -22.37% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.36% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -5.44% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 1.95% | -0.63% |
Volatility
IBCZ.DE vs. SNAW.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to iShares MSCI World ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SNAW.DE) at 2.85%. This indicates that IBCZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNAW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCZ.DE | SNAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 2.85% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 8.34% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 11.81% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 14.57% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 17.16% | -2.03% |
IBCZ.DE vs. SNAW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCZ.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SNAW.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBCZ.DE vs. SNAW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCZ.DE nor SNAW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, IBCZ.DE and SNAW.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SNAW.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SNAW.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBCZ.DE.
IBCZ.DE tracks MSCI World Diversified Multiple-Factor, while SNAW.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Screened. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBCZ.DE and 0.20% for SNAW.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCZ.DE and SNAW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer