PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCZ.DE vs. MVEW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCZ.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCZ.DE achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than MVEW.DE's 1.17% return.


IBCZ.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.84%
YTD
13.04%
6M
13.70%
1Y
27.80%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
11.45%

MVEW.DE

1D
0.07%
1M
1.79%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.16%
1Y
0.46%
3Y*
6.53%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCZ.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBCZ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
13.04%12.05%24.09%11.45%-10.83%31.27%17.39%
MVEW.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)
1.17%-0.99%17.25%6.27%-5.98%26.26%1.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCZ.DE and MVEW.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between IBCZ.DE and MVEW.DE has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCZ.DE vs. MVEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCZ.DE
IBCZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IBCZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MVEW.DE
MVEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MVEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCZ.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBCZ.DEMVEW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.02

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.23

0.10

+5.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.97

0.20

+20.76

IBCZ.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the MVEW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCZ.DE and MVEW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBCZ.DEMVEW.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

0.06

+2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.62

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.63

+0.05

Drawdowns

IBCZ.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, which is greater than MVEW.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCZ.DE and MVEW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCZ.DEMVEW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-13.19%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-4.68%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.98%

-13.19%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.98%

-13.19%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-5.75%

+5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-3.83%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

2.27%

-0.95%

Volatility

IBCZ.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.DE) at 2.58%. This indicates that IBCZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCZ.DEMVEW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.58%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

5.42%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.42%

7.97%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

10.25%

+3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.13%

10.82%

+4.31%

IBCZ.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCZ.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MVEW.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBCZ.DE vs. MVEW.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBCZ.DE nor MVEW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCZ.DE and MVEW.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MVEW.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVEW.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBCZ.DE.

IBCZ.DE tracks MSCI World Diversified Multiple-Factor, while MVEW.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBCZ.DE and 0.30% for MVEW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCZ.DE and MVEW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer