IBCZ.DE vs. EUNL.DE
IBCZ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EUNL.DE (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - IBCZ.DE tracks the MSCI World Diversified Multiple-Factor while EUNL.DE tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBCZ.DE returned 11.45%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for EUNL.DE. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IBCZ.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EUNL.DE.
Performance
IBCZ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCZ.DE achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCZ.DE has underperformed EUNL.DE with an annualized return of 11.45%, while EUNL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.
IBCZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- 1Y
- 27.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
EUNL.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
IBCZ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCZ.DE iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 13.04% | 12.05% | 24.09% | 11.45% | -10.83% | 31.27% | 0.44% | 24.79% | -8.31% | 11.03% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.86% | 7.90% | 25.93% | 20.13% | -13.59% | 32.71% | 5.48% | 31.34% | -5.13% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCZ.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2015 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IBCZ.DE and EUNL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCZ.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCZ.DE
EUNL.DE
IBCZ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCZ.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.40 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.23 | 3.64 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.97 | 14.52 | +6.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCZ.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.12 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.90 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.82 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
IBCZ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCZ.DE and EUNL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCZ.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -33.63% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | -6.50% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.98% | -21.73% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.98% | -21.73% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -33.63% | -0.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.31% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -4.25% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 1.64% | -0.32% |
Volatility
IBCZ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that IBCZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCZ.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 2.62% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 7.72% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 11.16% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 14.17% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 15.17% | -0.04% |
IBCZ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCZ.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBCZ.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCZ.DE nor EUNL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, IBCZ.DE and EUNL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EUNL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBCZ.DE.
IBCZ.DE tracks MSCI World Diversified Multiple-Factor, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBCZ.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCZ.DE and EUNL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer