IBCZ.DE vs. AMEC.DE
IBCZ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and AMEC.DE (Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - IBCZ.DE tracks the MSCI World Diversified Multiple-Factor while AMEC.DE tracks the Solactive Smart City. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBCZ.DE returned 12.00%/yr vs 6.68%/yr for AMEC.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBCZ.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for AMEC.DE.
Performance
IBCZ.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCZ.DE achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly lower than AMEC.DE's 30.58% return.
IBCZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- 1Y
- 27.80%
- 3Y*
- 18.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
AMEC.DE
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 10.78%
- YTD
- 30.58%
- 6M
- 29.29%
- 1Y
- 46.14%
- 3Y*
- 17.35%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCZ.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCZ.DE iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 13.04% | 12.05% | 24.09% | 11.45% | -10.83% | 31.27% | 0.44% | 3.49% |
AMEC.DE Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF | 30.58% | 9.65% | 16.27% | 1.43% | -18.74% | 9.30% | 9.10% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCZ.DE and AMEC.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IBCZ.DE and AMEC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCZ.DE vs. AMEC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCZ.DE
AMEC.DE
IBCZ.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) and Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCZ.DE | AMEC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.23 | 5.09 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.97 | 16.11 | +4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCZ.DE | AMEC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | 2.65 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.38 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.44 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
IBCZ.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum AMEC.DE drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCZ.DE and AMEC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCZ.DE | AMEC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -35.49% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | -9.02% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.98% | -24.98% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.98% | -27.33% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -1.34% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -11.50% | +6.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.32% | 2.86% | -1.54% |
Volatility
IBCZ.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) is 3.05%, while Amundi Index Smart City UCITS ETF (AMEC.DE) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that IBCZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCZ.DE | AMEC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 6.73% | -3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 13.09% | -4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 17.36% | -5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 17.51% | -3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 19.22% | -4.09% |
IBCZ.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCZ.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEC.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBCZ.DE vs. AMEC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCZ.DE nor AMEC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCZ.DE and AMEC.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEC.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEC.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBCZ.DE.
IBCZ.DE tracks MSCI World Diversified Multiple-Factor, while AMEC.DE tracks Solactive Smart City. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IBCZ.DE and 0.35% for AMEC.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCZ.DE and AMEC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer