PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCY.DE vs. ACU2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCY.DE vs. ACU2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF (IBCY.DE) and Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, IBCY.DE has underperformed ACU2.DE with an annualized return of 11.22%, while ACU2.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.18% annualized return.


IBCY.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
13.35%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
11.22%

ACU2.DE

1D
0.31%
1M
6.00%
YTD
13.23%
6M
13.20%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
14.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCY.DE vs. ACU2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBCY.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF
0.00%6.35%29.21%13.73%-11.70%36.60%0.17%28.63%-6.73%6.21%
ACU2.DE
Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR
13.23%1.61%26.66%22.75%-15.77%38.66%9.40%34.49%-1.28%6.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCY.DE and ACU2.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2015

0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between IBCY.DE and ACU2.DE has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCY.DE vs. ACU2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCY.DE
IBCY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IBCY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ACU2.DE
ACU2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ACU2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACU2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACU2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ACU2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACU2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCY.DE vs. ACU2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF (IBCY.DE) and Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBCY.DEACU2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.36

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

2.56

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.99

8.85

+11.14

IBCY.DE vs. ACU2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the ACU2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCY.DE and ACU2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBCY.DEACU2.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.00

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.83

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.87

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.90

-0.27

Drawdowns

IBCY.DE vs. ACU2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCY.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.54%, roughly equal to the maximum ACU2.DE drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCY.DE and ACU2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCY.DEACU2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.54%

-34.31%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-9.95%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.91%

-23.98%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-23.98%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.54%

-34.31%

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-4.32%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

2.88%

-2.21%

Volatility

IBCY.DE vs. ACU2.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Multifactor UCITS ETF (IBCY.DE) is 0.00%, while Amundi PEA MSCI USA ESG Leaders UCITS ETF EUR (ACU2.DE) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that IBCY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACU2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCY.DEACU2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.21%

-3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.00%

8.92%

-8.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.99%

12.76%

-4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

15.47%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

16.24%

-0.12%

IBCY.DE vs. ACU2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBCY.DE and ACU2.DE have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

IBCY.DE vs. ACU2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBCY.DE nor ACU2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCY.DE and ACU2.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCY.DE and ACU2.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

IBCY.DE tracks MSCI USA Diversified Multiple-Factor, while ACU2.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCY.DE and ACU2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer