PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCK.DE vs. IBCZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCK.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCK.DE achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than IBCZ.DE's 13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCK.DE has underperformed IBCZ.DE with an annualized return of 10.32%, while IBCZ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.


IBCK.DE

1D
0.27%
1M
4.51%
YTD
5.14%
6M
5.73%
1Y
9.44%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
10.32%

IBCZ.DE

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.84%
YTD
13.04%
6M
13.70%
1Y
27.80%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCK.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBCK.DE
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc)
5.14%-0.69%25.61%6.20%-6.04%35.73%-2.18%34.85%-1.47%2.29%
IBCZ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
13.04%12.05%24.09%11.45%-10.83%31.27%0.44%24.79%-8.31%11.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCK.DE and IBCZ.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2015

0.83

The correlation between IBCK.DE and IBCZ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCK.DE vs. IBCZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCK.DE
IBCK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IBCK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCZ.DE
IBCZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IBCZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCK.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBCK.DEIBCZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.45

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

5.23

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.31

20.97

-15.66

IBCK.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the IBCZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCK.DE and IBCZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBCK.DEIBCZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

2.42

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.84

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.75

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.69

+0.20

Drawdowns

IBCK.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCK.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, roughly equal to the maximum IBCZ.DE drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCK.DE and IBCZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCK.DEIBCZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.11%

-33.99%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.08%

-5.29%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-19.98%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.55%

-19.98%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.11%

-33.99%

+0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.60%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-4.52%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.32%

+0.43%

Volatility

IBCK.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCK.DE) is 2.26%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that IBCK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCK.DEIBCZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

3.05%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.71%

8.16%

-2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

11.42%

-2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.37%

14.11%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.02%

15.13%

-1.11%

IBCK.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCK.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCZ.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBCK.DE vs. IBCZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBCK.DE nor IBCZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCK.DE and IBCZ.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCK.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCK.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBCZ.DE.

IBCK.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while IBCZ.DE is Global Equities. IBCK.DE tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility, while IBCZ.DE tracks MSCI World Diversified Multiple-Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IBCK.DE and 0.50% for IBCZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCK.DE and IBCZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer