IBCI.L vs. ITPA.L
IBCI.L (iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and ITPA.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds from iShares - IBCI.L tracks the BBG Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (EUR) while ITPA.L tracks the BBG US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBCI.L returned 1.23% vs 2.86% for ITPA.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBCI.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ITPA.L.
Performance
IBCI.L vs. ITPA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCI.L achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than ITPA.L's 0.55% return.
IBCI.L
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 1.23%
- 3Y*
- 1.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
ITPA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 2.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBCI.L vs. ITPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBCI.L iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -0.01% | 6.03% | -2.75% |
ITPA.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 0.55% | 6.54% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCI.L and ITPA.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCI.L vs. ITPA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBCI.L
ITPA.L
IBCI.L vs. ITPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (ITPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBCI.L | ITPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.14 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 1.53 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 4.16 | -3.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBCI.L vs. ITPA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCI.L drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, which is greater than ITPA.L's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCI.L and ITPA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCI.L | ITPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.47% | -4.08% | -26.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.33% | -1.86% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.52% | -1.10% | -7.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -0.99% | -9.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 0.69% | +0.85% |
Volatility
IBCI.L vs. ITPA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (ITPA.L) at 0.77%. This indicates that IBCI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCI.L | ITPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 0.77% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.72% | 2.54% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.90% | 3.55% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.49% | 4.86% | +6.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 4.86% | +6.90% |
IBCI.L vs. ITPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCI.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ITPA.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBCI.L vs. ITPA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCI.L nor ITPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCI.L and ITPA.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCI.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCI.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for ITPA.L.
IBCI.L tracks BBG Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (EUR), while ITPA.L tracks BBG US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IBCI.L and 0.12% for ITPA.L.
Find the right allocation for IBCI.L and ITPA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer