IBCI.DE vs. SJPA.L
IBCI.DE (iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF) and SJPA.L (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBCI.DE is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while SJPA.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBCI.DE returned 1.55%/yr vs 9.06%/yr for SJPA.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBCI.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SJPA.L.
Performance
IBCI.DE vs. SJPA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBCI.DE is traded in EUR, while SJPA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SJPA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCI.DE achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than SJPA.L's 17.34% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCI.DE has underperformed SJPA.L with an annualized return of 1.55%, while SJPA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.06% annualized return.
IBCI.DE
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 3.37%
- 3Y*
- 1.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
SJPA.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 6.12%
- YTD
- 17.34%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 30.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
IBCI.DE vs. SJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCI.DE iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF | 3.15% | 0.81% | -0.17% | 5.41% | -9.30% | 6.19% | 2.83% | 6.31% | -1.54% | 1.05% |
SJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 17.36% | 12.02% | 13.59% | 15.15% | -11.05% | 8.23% | 5.00% | 21.98% | -10.27% | 10.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCI.DE and SJPA.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCI.DE vs. SJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBCI.DE
SJPA.L
IBCI.DE vs. SJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCI.DE | SJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.32 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 3.08 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 10.32 | -6.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCI.DE | SJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.69 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.61 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.56 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.56 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
IBCI.DE vs. SJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCI.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum SJPA.L drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCI.DE and SJPA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCI.DE | SJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.37% | -28.76% | +12.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.87% | -9.83% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.59% | -15.89% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.37% | -19.22% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.37% | -28.76% | +12.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.54% | -0.19% | -5.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -6.78% | +1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 2.94% | -2.16% |
Volatility
IBCI.DE vs. SJPA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) is 1.58%, while iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (SJPA.L) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that IBCI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SJPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCI.DE | SJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 3.71% | -2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.04% | 14.51% | -11.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.83% | 17.97% | -14.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.86% | 16.24% | -9.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 16.26% | -10.10% |
IBCI.DE vs. SJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCI.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SJPA.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBCI.DE vs. SJPA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCI.DE nor SJPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCI.DE and SJPA.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCI.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCI.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SJPA.L.
IBCI.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SJPA.L is Japan Equities. IBCI.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while SJPA.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IBCI.DE and 0.15% for SJPA.L.
Find the right allocation for IBCI.DE and SJPA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer