PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCH.DE vs. ISPA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCH.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IBCH.DE) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCH.DE achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than ISPA.DE's 13.48% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCH.DE has outperformed ISPA.DE with an annualized return of 11.23%, while ISPA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.98% annualized return.


IBCH.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
2.82%
YTD
8.84%
6M
9.58%
1Y
23.44%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
11.23%

ISPA.DE

1D
0.49%
1M
1.28%
YTD
13.48%
6M
15.35%
1Y
29.45%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCH.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBCH.DE
iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating
8.84%16.80%19.60%21.25%-18.84%23.63%11.16%24.84%-10.33%16.64%
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
13.48%19.72%12.97%4.80%0.43%22.39%-9.12%24.24%-7.51%2.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCH.DE and ISPA.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2011

0.73

The correlation between IBCH.DE and ISPA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCH.DE vs. ISPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCH.DE
IBCH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IBCH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ISPA.DE
ISPA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCH.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IBCH.DE) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBCH.DEISPA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.62

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

8.10

-5.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

28.73

-15.69

IBCH.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCH.DE and ISPA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBCH.DEISPA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

3.35

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.91

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.60

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.68

-0.04

Drawdowns

IBCH.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCH.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.56%, smaller than the maximum ISPA.DE drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCH.DE and ISPA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCH.DEISPA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.56%

-38.91%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.79%

-3.63%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-15.10%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.68%

-15.10%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

-38.91%

+5.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-1.09%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-4.46%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.03%

+0.79%

Volatility

IBCH.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IBCH.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that IBCH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISPA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCH.DEISPA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.62%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

6.51%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

8.77%

+2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

12.00%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.32%

14.79%

+0.53%

IBCH.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCH.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ISPA.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBCH.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBCH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISPA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCH.DE
iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
3.75%4.52%4.89%5.91%6.92%3.32%4.04%4.02%3.37%5.66%3.64%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCH.DE and ISPA.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISPA.DE is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISPA.DE is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IBCH.DE.

IBCH.DE tracks MSCI World 100% Hedged to EUR Net, while ISPA.DE tracks STOXX® Global Select Dividend 100 index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IBCH.DE and 0.46% for ISPA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCH.DE and ISPA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer