PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCH.DE vs. F50A.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IBCH.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCH.DE achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than F50A.DE's 10.81% return.


IBCH.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
4.27%
YTD
8.84%
6M
9.88%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
11.23%

F50A.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.68%
YTD
10.81%
6M
10.16%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBCH.DE
iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating
8.84%16.80%19.60%21.25%-18.84%23.63%8.01%
F50A.DE
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating
10.81%8.58%25.85%19.91%-13.61%32.73%-0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCH.DE and F50A.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2020

0.85

The correlation between IBCH.DE and F50A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCH.DE vs. F50A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCH.DE
IBCH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IBCH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

F50A.DE
F50A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
F50A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F50A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
F50A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
F50A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
F50A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IBCH.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBCH.DEF50A.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.40

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.66

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

14.61

-1.57

IBCH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the F50A.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCH.DE and F50A.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBCH.DEF50A.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.17

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.88

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.71

-0.08

Drawdowns

IBCH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCH.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.56%, roughly equal to the maximum F50A.DE drawdown of -32.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCH.DE and F50A.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCH.DEF50A.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.56%

-32.88%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.79%

-6.62%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-21.49%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.68%

-21.49%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.39%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-4.72%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.66%

+0.16%

Volatility

IBCH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IBCH.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that IBCH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than F50A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCH.DEF50A.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.63%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

7.95%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

11.18%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

14.60%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.32%

17.70%

-2.38%

IBCH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCH.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than F50A.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBCH.DE vs. F50A.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBCH.DE nor F50A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCH.DE and F50A.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IBCH.DE.

IBCH.DE tracks MSCI World 100% Hedged to EUR Net, while F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IBCH.DE and 0.05% for F50A.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCH.DE and F50A.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer