IBCF.DE vs. DBPG.DE
IBCF.DE (iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc)) and DBPG.DE (Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IBCF.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 EUR Hedged Index, while DBPG.DE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBCF.DE returned 12.48%/yr vs 24.01%/yr for DBPG.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBCF.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DBPG.DE.
Performance
IBCF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCF.DE achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than DBPG.DE's 19.52% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCF.DE has underperformed DBPG.DE with an annualized return of 12.48%, while DBPG.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 24.01% annualized return.
IBCF.DE
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 9.66%
- 1Y
- 24.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
DBPG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 9.51%
- YTD
- 19.52%
- 6M
- 20.06%
- 1Y
- 51.09%
- 3Y*
- 34.60%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 24.01%
IBCF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCF.DE iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) | 8.84% | 15.42% | 22.97% | 23.21% | -21.83% | 28.51% | 14.47% | 27.13% | -8.40% | 18.78% |
DBPG.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 19.52% | 13.51% | 53.27% | 44.01% | -36.28% | 78.38% | 9.47% | 68.71% | -12.05% | 25.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCF.DE and DBPG.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2011 | 0.92 |
The correlation between IBCF.DE and DBPG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCF.DE vs. DBPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCF.DE
DBPG.DE
IBCF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCF.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCF.DE | DBPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 3.30 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 12.66 | -0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCF.DE | DBPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.26 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.71 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.78 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
IBCF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCF.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.06%, smaller than the maximum DBPG.DE drawdown of -59.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCF.DE and DBPG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCF.DE | DBPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.06% | -59.28% | +24.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -15.43% | +6.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.34% | -38.46% | +20.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -38.46% | +12.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.06% | -59.28% | +24.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -1.10% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -8.85% | +4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 4.02% | -1.98% |
Volatility
IBCF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCF.DE) is 3.08%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBPG.DE) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that IBCF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBPG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCF.DE | DBPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 5.65% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 15.61% | -6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 22.46% | -10.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 30.11% | -14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 31.48% | -15.14% |
IBCF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCF.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DBPG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBCF.DE vs. DBPG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCF.DE nor DBPG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IBCF.DE and DBPG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IBCF.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCF.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DBPG.DE.
IBCF.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while DBPG.DE is Leveraged Equities. IBCF.DE tracks S&P 500 EUR Hedged Index, while DBPG.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IBCF.DE and 0.60% for DBPG.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCF.DE and DBPG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer