IBCD.DE vs. EUNN.DE
IBCD.DE (iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)) and EUNN.DE (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBCD.DE is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx® USD Liquid Investment Grade, while EUNN.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBCD.DE returned 1.88%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for EUNN.DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBCD.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUNN.DE.
Performance
IBCD.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCD.DE achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than EUNN.DE's 16.53% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCD.DE has underperformed EUNN.DE with an annualized return of 1.88%, while EUNN.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.05% annualized return.
IBCD.DE
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 3.27%
- 3Y*
- 1.65%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
EUNN.DE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
IBCD.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCD.DE iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.30% | -4.58% | 6.33% | 4.97% | -12.66% | 6.14% | 0.35% | 20.25% | -0.24% | -6.49% |
EUNN.DE iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 16.53% | 13.46% | 12.90% | 15.16% | -11.47% | 9.25% | 4.10% | 22.24% | -10.32% | 10.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCD.DE and EUNN.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2009 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCD.DE vs. EUNN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCD.DE
EUNN.DE
IBCD.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCD.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.32 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 3.14 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.78 | 10.51 | -8.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCD.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 1.67 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.61 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.56 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.53 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
IBCD.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCD.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.86%, which is greater than EUNN.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCD.DE and EUNN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCD.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.86% | -28.55% | -13.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.93% | -9.58% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -15.81% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.12% | -19.41% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.51% | -28.55% | +11.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.49% | -0.27% | -7.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.84% | -6.85% | -2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 2.86% | -1.21% |
Volatility
IBCD.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE) is 1.33%, while iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) has a volatility of 3.16%. This indicates that IBCD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCD.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 3.16% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.22% | 14.53% | -10.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.21% | 17.97% | -11.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.18% | 16.04% | -6.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.07% | 16.08% | -7.01% |
IBCD.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCD.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNN.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBCD.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Dividend Comparison
IBCD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, while EUNN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNN.DE iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBCD.DE iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.24% | 4.39% | 4.52% | 4.34% | 3.60% | 2.21% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 2.97% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCD.DE and EUNN.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IBCD.DE.
IBCD.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while EUNN.DE is Japan Equities. IBCD.DE tracks iBoxx® USD Liquid Investment Grade, while EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IBCD.DE and 0.12% for EUNN.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCD.DE and EUNN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer