IBCD.DE vs. DBXJ.DE
IBCD.DE (iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)) and DBXJ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IBCD.DE is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx® USD Liquid Investment Grade, while DBXJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBCD.DE returned 1.81%/yr vs 8.87%/yr for DBXJ.DE. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBCD.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DBXJ.DE.
Performance
IBCD.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCD.DE achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly lower than DBXJ.DE's 17.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IBCD.DE has underperformed DBXJ.DE with an annualized return of 1.81%, while DBXJ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.87% annualized return.
IBCD.DE
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
DBXJ.DE
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 37.99%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.87%
IBCD.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCD.DE iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.10% | -3.98% | 6.70% | 5.34% | -12.51% | 6.56% | 0.75% | 20.71% | 0.29% | -6.12% |
DBXJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C | 17.68% | 12.58% | 13.75% | 16.43% | -12.41% | 9.99% | 5.08% | 21.75% | -9.54% | 9.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCD.DE and DBXJ.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2007 | 0.19 |
The correlation between IBCD.DE and DBXJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCD.DE vs. DBXJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCD.DE
DBXJ.DE
IBCD.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBCD.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 3.70 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 11.94 | -7.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBCD.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCD.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.43%, smaller than the maximum DBXJ.DE drawdown of -51.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCD.DE and DBXJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCD.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.43% | -51.22% | +18.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.76% | -10.21% | +6.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.27% | -16.95% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.71% | -19.01% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.43% | -28.04% | +10.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.27% | -4.84% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -14.55% | +7.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | 3.17% | -1.66% |
Volatility
IBCD.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCD.DE) is 2.00%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that IBCD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBXJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCD.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 6.44% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.18% | 16.06% | -11.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.40% | 19.77% | -13.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.15% | 16.80% | -7.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.99% | 16.42% | -7.43% |
IBCD.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCD.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DBXJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBCD.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
IBCD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, while DBXJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBCD.DE iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.99% | 5.03% | 4.88% | 4.69% | 3.79% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.43% | 3.61% | 3.43% | 3.26% | 3.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCD.DE and DBXJ.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IBCD.DE.
IBCD.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DBXJ.DE is Japan Equities. IBCD.DE tracks iBoxx® USD Liquid Investment Grade, while DBXJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IBCD.DE and 0.12% for DBXJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCD.DE and DBXJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer