PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCC.DE vs. XUTE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCC.DE vs. XUTE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (XUTE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCC.DE achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than XUTE.DE's -1.03% return.


IBCC.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.63%
6M
3.15%
YTD
4.60%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*

XUTE.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.39%
6M
-0.88%
YTD
-1.03%
1Y
1.43%
3Y*
0.90%
5Y*
-2.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCC.DE vs. XUTE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBCC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.60%-7.23%11.42%1.23%7.25%8.42%-8.13%-8.71%
XUTE.DE
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
-1.03%4.18%-1.19%1.61%-14.67%-3.37%6.64%3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCC.DE and XUTE.DE is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019

-0.18

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between IBCC.DE and XUTE.DE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.18 to -0.39, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCC.DE vs. XUTE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCC.DE
IBCC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IBCC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

XUTE.DE
XUTE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XUTE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUTE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUTE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XUTE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUTE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCC.DE vs. XUTE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (XUTE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCC.DEXUTE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.07

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

0.41

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.59

0.99

+2.60

IBCC.DE vs. XUTE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the XUTE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCC.DE and XUTE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCC.DE vs. XUTE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum XUTE.DE drawdown of -23.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCC.DE and XUTE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCC.DEXUTE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-23.77%

+7.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.24%

-3.49%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.59%

-5.77%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.69%

-20.57%

+8.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-16.92%

+11.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-9.88%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

1.43%

-0.01%

Volatility

IBCC.DE vs. XUTE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (XUTE.DE) at 1.00%. This indicates that IBCC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUTE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCC.DEXUTE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.00%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.32%

2.74%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

3.71%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.57%

5.70%

+1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.41%

5.08%

+3.33%

IBCC.DE vs. XUTE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCC.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XUTE.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCC.DE vs. XUTE.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBCC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than XUTE.DE's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBCC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.99%4.63%6.49%4.14%0.47%0.09%1.39%1.22%0.00%
XUTE.DE
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
3.40%3.36%3.56%2.27%2.15%3.30%1.87%1.28%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCC.DE and XUTE.DE have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCC.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCC.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for XUTE.DE.

IBCC.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index, while XUTE.DE tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBCC.DE and 0.10% for XUTE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCC.DE and XUTE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer