IBCC.DE vs. SEC0.DE
IBCC.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and SEC0.DE (iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IBCC.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index, while SEC0.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBCC.DE returned 3.02%/yr vs 54.46%/yr for SEC0.DE. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. IBCC.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SEC0.DE.
Performance
IBCC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCC.DE achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than SEC0.DE's 98.18% return.
IBCC.DE
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- 3.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- —
SEC0.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- 6M
- 92.87%
- YTD
- 98.18%
- 1Y
- 165.40%
- 3Y*
- 54.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBCC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.60% | -7.23% | 11.42% | 1.23% | 7.25% | 4.49% |
SEC0.DE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 98.18% | 36.46% | 20.85% | 61.01% | -32.22% | 21.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCC.DE and SEC0.DE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021 | -0.12 |
The correlation between IBCC.DE and SEC0.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to -0.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCC.DE vs. SEC0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCC.DE
SEC0.DE
IBCC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBCC.DE | SEC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.59 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 12.90 | -10.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 41.13 | -36.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBCC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum SEC0.DE drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCC.DE and SEC0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCC.DE | SEC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -39.35% | +23.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.24% | -12.90% | +9.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | -39.35% | +27.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -11.08% | +5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.99% | -11.74% | +3.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 4.04% | -2.61% |
Volatility
IBCC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) is 1.88%, while iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) has a volatility of 17.34%. This indicates that IBCC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEC0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCC.DE | SEC0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.88% | 17.34% | -15.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.35% | 29.82% | -25.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.23% | 36.48% | -30.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 30.70% | -23.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 30.70% | -22.27% |
IBCC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCC.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SEC0.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBCC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Dividend Comparison
IBCC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while SEC0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.99% | 4.63% | 6.49% | 4.14% | 0.47% | 0.09% | 1.39% | 1.22% |
SEC0.DE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCC.DE and SEC0.DE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCC.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCC.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SEC0.DE.
IBCC.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while SEC0.DE is Semiconductors. IBCC.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index, while SEC0.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBCC.DE and 0.35% for SEC0.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCC.DE and SEC0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer