PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCC.DE vs. EUN8.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCC.DE vs. EUN8.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) and iShares € Govt Bond 10-15yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EUN8.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCC.DE achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than EUN8.DE's -2.15% return.


IBCC.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.63%
6M
3.15%
YTD
4.60%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*

EUN8.DE

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.79%
6M
-1.22%
YTD
-2.15%
1Y
-1.39%
3Y*
1.56%
5Y*
-4.18%
10Y*
-0.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCC.DE vs. EUN8.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IBCC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.60%-7.23%11.42%1.23%7.25%8.42%-8.13%-8.71%
EUN8.DE
iShares € Govt Bond 10-15yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-2.15%0.68%1.21%10.63%-25.03%-4.22%6.60%10.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCC.DE and EUN8.DE is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019

-0.08

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between IBCC.DE and EUN8.DE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.08 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCC.DE vs. EUN8.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCC.DE
IBCC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IBCC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

EUN8.DE
EUN8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EUN8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCC.DE vs. EUN8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) and iShares € Govt Bond 10-15yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EUN8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCC.DEEUN8.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.97

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

-0.26

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.59

-0.60

+4.19

IBCC.DE vs. EUN8.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the EUN8.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCC.DE and EUN8.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCC.DE vs. EUN8.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum EUN8.DE drawdown of -29.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCC.DE and EUN8.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCC.DEEUN8.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-29.75%

+13.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.24%

-5.41%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.59%

-6.67%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.69%

-29.15%

+17.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-21.14%

+15.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-8.13%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

2.31%

-0.89%

Volatility

IBCC.DE vs. EUN8.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) is 1.36%, while iShares € Govt Bond 10-15yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EUN8.DE) has a volatility of 1.77%. This indicates that IBCC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUN8.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCC.DEEUN8.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.77%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.32%

5.65%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

6.98%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.57%

9.38%

-1.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.41%

8.31%

+0.10%

IBCC.DE vs. EUN8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCC.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EUN8.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCC.DE vs. EUN8.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBCC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than EUN8.DE's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUN8.DE
iShares € Govt Bond 10-15yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
1.68%3.14%2.95%2.09%0.52%0.31%0.58%1.20%1.26%1.13%1.26%0.75%
IBCC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.99%4.63%6.49%4.14%0.47%0.09%1.39%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCC.DE and EUN8.DE have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCC.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCC.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EUN8.DE.

IBCC.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index, while EUN8.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 10-15 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBCC.DE and 0.15% for EUN8.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCC.DE and EUN8.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer