PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCC.DE vs. DFOB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCC.DE vs. DFOB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Bond 25+Y UCITS ETF (Dist) (DFOB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCC.DE achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than DFOB.DE's -0.80% return.


IBCC.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.63%
6M
3.15%
YTD
4.60%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*

DFOB.DE

1D
0.44%
1M
-3.30%
6M
-2.18%
YTD
-0.80%
1Y
-2.63%
3Y*
-3.11%
5Y*
-11.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCC.DE vs. DFOB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBCC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.60%-7.23%11.42%1.23%7.25%8.42%-4.88%
DFOB.DE
Amundi Euro Government Bond 25+Y UCITS ETF (Dist)
-0.80%-10.03%-3.74%9.37%-40.96%-10.62%3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCC.DE and DFOB.DE is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

-0.09

The correlation between IBCC.DE and DFOB.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCC.DE vs. DFOB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCC.DE
IBCC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IBCC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DFOB.DE
DFOB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
DFOB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFOB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFOB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
DFOB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFOB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCC.DE vs. DFOB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Bond 25+Y UCITS ETF (Dist) (DFOB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCC.DEDFOB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.97

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

-0.39

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.59

-0.75

+4.34

IBCC.DE vs. DFOB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the DFOB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCC.DE and DFOB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCC.DE vs. DFOB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum DFOB.DE drawdown of -54.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCC.DE and DFOB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCC.DEDFOB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-54.51%

+38.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.24%

-6.66%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.59%

-18.08%

+6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.69%

-51.78%

+40.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.33%

-51.10%

+45.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-36.49%

+28.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

3.49%

-2.07%

Volatility

IBCC.DE vs. DFOB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) is 1.36%, while Amundi Euro Government Bond 25+Y UCITS ETF (Dist) (DFOB.DE) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that IBCC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFOB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCC.DEDFOB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

2.94%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.32%

8.28%

-3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.13%

10.89%

-4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.57%

17.94%

-10.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.41%

17.09%

-8.68%

IBCC.DE vs. DFOB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBCC.DE and DFOB.DE have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCC.DE vs. DFOB.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBCC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than DFOB.DE's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DFOB.DE
Amundi Euro Government Bond 25+Y UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.41%3.39%1.55%2.16%2.43%1.51%0.58%0.00%
IBCC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.99%4.63%6.49%4.14%0.47%0.09%1.39%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCC.DE and DFOB.DE have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCC.DE and DFOB.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

IBCC.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index, while DFOB.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Treasury 50bn 25+ Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCC.DE and DFOB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer