IBCA vs. PIFI
IBCA (iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF) and PIFI (ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. IBCA is passively managed, while PIFI is actively managed. Over the past year, IBCA returned 6.55% vs 3.48% for PIFI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBCA charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PIFI.
Performance
IBCA vs. PIFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCA achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly higher than PIFI's -0.13% return.
IBCA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- 1Y
- 6.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIFI
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCA vs. PIFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBCA iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF | 0.20% | 7.15% |
PIFI ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF | -0.13% | 4.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCA and PIFI is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IBCA and PIFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCA vs. PIFI — Risk / Return Rank
IBCA
PIFI
IBCA vs. PIFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) and ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF (PIFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCA | PIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.81 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | 5.24 | +1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCA | PIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.22 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
IBCA vs. PIFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, smaller than the maximum PIFI drawdown of -10.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCA and PIFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCA | PIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -10.59% | +7.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -1.93% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -1.45% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -3.23% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.66% | +0.34% |
Volatility
IBCA vs. PIFI - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF (PIFI) at 0.81%. This indicates that IBCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCA | PIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 0.81% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.62% | 1.83% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.96% | 2.61% | +2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.76% | 3.66% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.76% | 3.48% | +2.28% |
IBCA vs. PIFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PIFI's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBCA vs. PIFI - Dividend Comparison
IBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than PIFI's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCA iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF | 4.67% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIFI ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF | 3.76% | 3.16% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 1.22% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCA and PIFI have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBCA has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to PIFI (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBCA dropped -3.48% vs PIFI's -10.59%.
On 1-year performance, IBCA leads with 6.55% vs 3.48% for PIFI. On fees, IBCA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, PIFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBCA has performed better with a 6.55% return vs 3.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBCA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PIFI.
IBCA has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 3.76% for PIFI.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and ClearShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBCA and 0.45% for PIFI.
PIFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBCA and PIFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer