IBCA vs. FFUT
IBCA (iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBCA is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the ICE 2035 Maturity US Corporate Index, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. IBCA is passively managed, while FFUT is actively managed. Over the past year, IBCA returned 5.53% vs 18.91% for FFUT. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. IBCA charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.
Performance
IBCA vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCA achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 9.23% return.
IBCA
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 5.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFUT
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBCA vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBCA iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF | 0.24% | 5.61% |
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 9.23% | 8.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCA and FFUT is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCA vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank
IBCA
FFUT
IBCA vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBCA | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.33 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 4.77 | -3.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.32 | 15.04 | -9.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBCA vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCA drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, smaller than the maximum FFUT drawdown of -3.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCA and FFUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCA | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -3.98% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -3.98% | +0.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -3.98% | +2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.83% | -0.94% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 1.26% | -0.22% |
Volatility
IBCA vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) is 1.35%, while Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that IBCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCA | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 2.92% | -1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.72% | 8.96% | -5.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.90% | 11.23% | -6.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 11.03% | -5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 11.03% | -5.29% |
IBCA vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCA has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBCA vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison
IBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than FFUT's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 1.91% | 2.09% |
IBCA iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF | 4.67% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCA and FFUT have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFUT has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to IBCA (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBCA dropped -3.48% vs FFUT's -3.98%.
On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 18.91% vs 5.53% for IBCA. On fees, IBCA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBCA has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 18.91% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBCA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.
IBCA has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 1.91% for FFUT.
IBCA is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBCA and 0.80% for FFUT.
FFUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBCA and FFUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer